sml logo Dark Ages Re-Creation Company sml logo
Overview
Oct 12, 2015
Jun 20, 2015
Apr 25, 2015
May 11, 2013
May 27, 2012
Nov 5, 2011
Oct 9, 2011
July 28, 2011
June 11, 2011
Nov 6, 2010
Aug 21, 2010
June 12, 2010
Nov 7, 2009
Oct 11, 2009
May 30, 2009
Nov 8, 2008
Oct 12, 2008
Jun 14, 2008
Apr 13, 2008
Oct 27, 2007
Oct 8, 2007
Jun 10, 2007 - Excav.
Jun 9, 2007 - Second
Jun 9, 2007 - First
Nov 5, 2006
Sep 1-2, 2006
Jun 10, 2006
Jun 10, 2006 - Tools
Nov 4, 2005
Sep 1, 2005 - CanIron V
Jun 11, 2005
May 14, 2005 - OABA
Jan 14, 2005 - Consolid.
Oct 24, 2004
Jun 3, 2004
Jun 3, 2004 - Design
Jun 3, 2004 - Questions
May, 2003 - Analysis
May 2003
May 2002

Iron consolidation weekend - Jan 2005

Beating the Bloom

We gathered on a chilly January day to try beating the blooms we had down into bars.

The Team:

Leader Darrell Markewitz
Staff Ken Cook
Gustof
Recorder Neil Peterson
Smelt_cd Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge.  Copies of the CD can be purchased here.


thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail
Available were materials from four different smelts DARC EconoNorse - 6 pieces
A: 1.66 Kg, 300 cm3
B: 250g
C,D,E,F: 100 g
Markewitz Norse - 4 pieces
A&B: c. 20g
C: 1.025 Kg
D: 1.84 Kg
Markewitz Norse - Piece D A look at the glassy slag with iron appearing in the top right.
thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail  
Part of the cut on the DARC bloom. Nice shiny metal. Sauder & Williams ElectroRoman 3.3 Kg, 600 cm3 McCarthy Tatara - four pieces
A: 150g, 50 cm3
B: 1 Kg, 100 cm3
C: 325g, 75 cm3
D 220g
 


On examining the materials available the following decisions were made:

McCarthy Tatara - On examination of the four pieces: one had a visible 'bright' colour (after quenching) suggesting a high carbon content, two had a lighter, more spongey texture, and the last one was more condensed It was decided to use this more condensed fragment for the day's work. As other pieces from this smelt had been successfully consolidated to workable bar by others (at the Early Iron Symposium) it was further decided to work this piece first.

Sauder & Williams ElectroRoman This material was only one section of a much larger bloom. It was already partially consolidated. Because of the density and size, it was decided to leave working this bloom to a later time.

Markewitz Norse - On examining the new section, along with the surface appearance of the first section (by Elizabeth Hendrix) it was decided not to further work this bloom. The iron is very light and bubbly - and shows a clear formation around the edges of charcoal pieces embedded. The majority of the material also is composed of a solid mass of slag at the lower 2/3 of the piece. It was felt this bloom is better retained as is for research / education.

DARC EconoNorse - Material from this smelt was the primary focus of the team. It was decided to retain the smaller section for future study and reference. The larger piece would be worked in the forge.

Progress of Work: (only briefly covered here)

1. Each piece was dried (from volume measurement) on top of the wood stove  
2. The piece was pre heated in the gas forge. The top temperature reached was a medium to bright orange. thumbnail
3. At this point the piece was transfered into a coal forge  
4. Primary compacting was done with a hand hammer, the material at a yellow through orange heat. This stage mainly consisted of collapsing voids and working any surface fragments into the centre. thumbnail thumbnail
5. Care was taken to gather any fragments that broke off that were much bigger than peanut sized. thumbnail
6. The roughly egg shaped piece was now compressed towards a rectangular profile. This was done via two strikers (with about 5 lb hammers) using light strokes. The individual imacts were directed by the strikers - collapsing material that stood up from the surface. The block was constantly rotated to all sides. thumbnail
thumbnail
7. During this process, several courses of welding were undertaken. This was done with the hand hammer to allow for diagonal strokes. These functioned to seal the many diagonal cracks within the material. thumbnail
8. Once the block was roughly rectangular and mostly compressed, a more standard series of forge welds were taken on each of the six sides using the hand hammer.  
9. To spead the process, next the block was drawn under the air hammer. Each forging step started at a welding heat. thumbnail
10. The block was drawn to roughly 7 inches long by 1/2 thick by about 1 1/2 wide. thumbnail
11. The block was nicked with a hot set at the mid line and folded. Borax flux was used. The block was then forge welded, again a standard weld with the hand hammer. thumbnail
13. The block was trimmed to shape with the hand hammer, and left to air cool. Latter spark testing would suggest the metal has a mid level carbon content. thumbnail
thumbnail
The bar still warm showing the weld thumbnail
The finished bar thumbnail
The slag ring from the bottom of the forge thumbnail


Having established some feel for the process of consolidating a bloom, the team prepared to work the bloom from the DARC EconoNorse smelt. After a short coffee break, a fresh coal fire was started. Tasks were re-assigned. The piece to be worked was roughly three times the size of that from the first sequence. A similar sequence of actions was followed:
  1. Drying

  2. Pre-heat

  3. Transfer to coal forge

  4. Under the work of the hand hammer, during the very first heat, it was noticed that a large volume of very liquid. glassy slag was squirting out from the interior. This would usually be accompanied by a fragment of bloom cracking away. On the second or third heat, the mass split into three larger fragments. Large deposits of slag were clearly visible on the interior surfaces. On the bloom, one section that was roughly circular and slightly flattened had stood up off the surface of the mass. When hammered, this section was obviously more compressed to start with (from an attempt to consolidate the mass after extraction from the smelter ??). Deemed 'the puck', it was decided to progress with this piece of the bloom and set the others aside for later work.

    thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail
  5. As with the first sequence, this material was worked with the hand hammer. The mass was compressed to the centre, strokes aimed so to fold individual pieces together. Generally this was done at a yellow heat, although several welding heats were also taken. The results here were quite different than the first sequence. The material collapsed quickly, but continuted to fracture. No modification in hammer stokes or working temperatures seemed to prevent this. The end result was a cluster of peanut to half walnut sized fragments with irregular edges.

    thumbnail thumbnail thumbnail
    Bloom on anvil Another side Ken & Gus hammer
    thumbnail thumbnail  
    Shaping the bar Examining the bar  
  6. The appearance of the cooled fragments, as well as their action under the hammer suggested that this material might in fact be a high carbon 'cast' iron. One fragment was water cooled and spark tested against a known piece of modern cast iron. The sparks were almost identical. An image of the fragments produced in this sequence, shown against their relative positions on the starting bloom, can be seen at: here
Conclusions
  1. The team was able to establish a rough process for consolidating a smelted bloom mass into a working bar of metal. (It is noted that this was related to smaller fragments, with existing equipment suited to pieces no larger than roughly 6 x 6 x 4 inches.) It was also understood that a large number of more modern technologies were employed. Further experiments and practical experience must be gathered towards using Viking Age tools and equipment for the consolidation process.
  2. It was obvious that although the DARC smelt of 10/23/04 had resulted in a metallic bloom, this mass proved have too high a carbon content to allow it to be consolidated into a workable iron bar. Obviously closer examination has to be made into the carbon control phase of the smelting process. Historically a 'failed bloom' such as was produced at the last smelt would have been smashed to fragments and re-processed to lower its carbon content. For the purposes of our experimental sequence, it was decided that the fragments on hand would be retained for further study and documentation.

Smelt_cd Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge.  Copies of the CD can be purchased here.
      Updated: 4 Dec, 2007
Text © Neil Peterson, Darrell Markewitz, 2007   Photographs © Individual artists   Copyright details
Contact us